浅析WTO争端解决机制中的“法庭之友”现象

论文编号:GM170     论文字数:11085,页数:17

摘   要

     世贸争端解决机制在解决国际经济贸易纠纷方面发挥着重要作用。但是，任何新生的事物都有一个不断成长和完善的过程，DSB也存着的不足之处。“法庭之友”是WTO争端解决机制中争议得激烈的话题之一，专家组及上诉机构将“法庭之友”的陈述作为“寻求信息”的来源这种做法引起了争议。法庭之友也是多哈回合中WTO争端解决机制方面中一个议题。
本论文主要讨论WTO争端解决机制下的“法庭之友”现象。介绍“法庭之友”的渊源，通过四个案例分析法庭之友在WTO争端解决机制中的实践应用及发展，讨论各方对“法庭之友”提交的诉状接受或拒绝的态度及原因，最后介绍多哈回合WTO争端解决机制议题中有关“法庭之友”的问题。

【关键词】 法庭之友    世贸组织争端解决机制   非政府组织 

    
Abstract

The WTO Dispute Settlement Body plays an important part in the settlement of international economy disputes. However, every new-born thing suffers the process of improvement. The DSU shows some insufficiencies in the execution. The Amicus Curiae has become one of the most heated discuss topics in the DSU for the expert group  and  the appellate body treat the statement of Amicus Curiae as the source of seeking information. Meanwhile, Amicus Curiae is a topic about the DSU in the Doha Round.
This thesis mainly analyzes Amicus Cuiae. It discusses about the origin of Amicus Curiae, analyzes the practice and development of Amicus Curiae in the DSU through four cases, then presents the each party’s attitude towards Amicus Curiae and the reason for approve or against. The last part introduces the topic of Amicus Curiae in the Doha Round.

【Key Words】  Amicus Curiae; DSU; NGO

目   录
前言 ..............................................................2
1.“法庭之友”概述 ................................................3
1.1 “法庭之友”的概念 ............................................3
1.2 “法庭之友”的沿革及发展 ......................................4
2. “法庭之友”在WTO争端解决机制中的实践与发展 ....................5
2.1美国汽油标准案 .................................................5
2.2海龟案 .........................................................6
2.3英国钢铁公司补贴案 .............................................7
2.4欧共体石棉案 ...................................................8
3. “法庭之友”的适用与接受的问题 .................................9
3.1 反对态度...................................................... 9
3.2 赞成态度 ......................................................10
4. 多哈回合中有关WTO争端解决机制的“法庭之友”问题 ................11
结束语 ............................................................12
参考文献 ..........................................................15
致   谢 ...........................................................17